Friday, June 27, 2008

Johnnie Winnona Ross in Santa Fe



I found this rather interesting article about JWRs recent show (at James Kelly in Santa Fe) the other day. I have to say its a rather interesting take on a his exhibition. This passage in particular:

Too often artists rely on the sum of an exhibition to create the sense of a greater whole, even if the individual pieces fall flat. With Deep Creek Seeps, however, the desire is to get rid of the exhibition and focus on a singular work.

I can understand the approach the reviewer takes, especially in light of the few really powerful solo shows that have only had one work (in my mind the Eric Fischl show at Mary Boone in the early eighties comes to mind - among others). That said, its really quite a treat to read quality art criticism in a regional newspaper.

One last thing, I don't see the "Rothko-ness" in JWRs work - I don't see or feel the same approach to the spiritual or even the personal anxiety, just the opposite JWRs work seems calmer and more at ease with itself than Rothkos. Not that makes one better or worse, just different.

The whole article is here.


Johnnie Winona Ross, Dark Creek, 2008

Labels: ,

Monday, June 23, 2008

Diebenkorn in New Mexico

I'm a big fan of Richard Diebenkorn, however to be fair, this show is a great disappointment.

In what amounts to a show of his artworks while earning his masters degree, the show falls flat. I think the problem could be that this work is clearly not mature - in fact it is fast, thin, and a little bit generic in its feel. RD was at the time of his New Mexico experience, painting in the style of the abstract expressionists - I should really clarify that - because of the diversity of images created by that group, Diebenkorn was mining a style that felt like deKooning with a touch of Robert Motherwell thrown in. As far as student work - that is all well and good, the problem arises in that the questions that the ABEX painters were addressing is completely absent in these works. They come across as a series of images of wanting to be taken seriously without providing enough firepower to support that approach.

I rarely do a bad review on this site - I think enough people are negative enough as it is - why add to it. However in this case, I had pumped this show up twice before seeing it and was so let down I felt that I owed at least some semblance of my truth to you the reader after actually seeing this show.

There was one thing I was really hoping to see after I realized the weakness's of the show. That is the sense of place that Diebenkorn has transfixed in his Ocean Park series, I was really hoping for that same kind of place in these paintings. Unfortunately that is not here. Lets hope that a show of his more mature work will be making the rounds soon - this is not the kind of show that does a reputation any good, especially the stellar reputation of an american master like Richard Diebenkorn.

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, June 17, 2008

Briefly noted

I have recently sold my painting Poppies in the Field to the DC Commission on the Arts and Humanities (DCCAH). This is my first sale to a governmental agency.

DCCAH also owns work by artists such as: Lois Mailou Jones, John Dreyfus, James Wells, and Sam Gilliam. So I feel I'm in pretty good standing.

Labels: , ,

Monday, June 16, 2008

This one slipped by me, Diebenkorn in New Mexico at the Phillips



I've written a brief bit about this show before, naturally I assumed that the show was not traveling - I love being wrong, especially when I don't have to go very far to see the show.

Expect a real review early next week - but go ahead and see the show for if nothing else some new questions about a man whose work is so integrated with a city and how it started in a desert.

Richard Diebenkorn, Untitled (Albuquerque), 1952. Oil on canvas, 68 x 60 inches (174.6 x 152.4 cm). The Buck Collection, Laguna Beach, California. Copyright The Estate of Richard Diebenkorn.

Labels: , ,

Friday, May 16, 2008

Johnnie Winona Ross at James Kelly Contemporary (Santa Fe)



Johnnie Winona Ross dropped me a note the other day to let me know of a new show of his work - this time at James Kelly Contemporary in Santa Fe. It also marks a new direction in JWR's art practice. By this I mean a horizontal rectilinear shape as opposed to a nearly square approach.

I will not be seeing this exhibition, however JWR is one of the more interesting artists I've stumbled across in the last few years. So if you get the chance, try not to miss it.

Deep Creek Seeps, 2008, Acrylic gypsum, titanium, zinc, various oxides, marble burnished on bleached linen, 48 x 72 inches

Labels: ,

Tuesday, May 13, 2008

Robert Rauschenberg


Robert Rauschenberg died.

I have a number of things to say, but I cant until tomorrow.

Robert Rauschenberg in 1953. Photo by Allan Grant, Life Magazine © Time Warner Inc/Robert Rauschenberg/VAGA, New York/DACS, London

Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, April 15, 2008

Artomatic 2008

The other day I mentioned I has going to participate in AOM - last time was so good to me, I figured why not? I still feel that way. I have been thinking about what I would do - rehang some of the work from my DCAC show? or something different?

I think I'm going the different route.

I have recently been doing quite a few white on white pieces and think this might be a good place to present a very tightly focused group of my work. I'm pretty excited about this. I hope you can come by my booth (D7 on the 5th floor) and say hello.

One More Artomatic Note: the building is brand new and really nice. Last years show was on two floors and little bit cramped - this year its on something like 5 floors and feels like it will be very spacious. Hope you can make it.

Labels: , , ,

Thursday, April 10, 2008

Some good news to offset the bad

So enough with my trails and tribulations about the house/studio. Lets move on to some better news but, before I start, Sorry for being away for the last 10 days or so. I was just caught up in the finals of the regular season (Go Caps!) and spent too much time at the rink and in front of the TV.

Solo Show in Philadelphia this September
Doug Witmer has been kind enough to set up a casual showing of my paperworks at Green Line Projects. I'm thrilled to be having even a cafe show in another city by someone who I have admired from a distance. I'll talk more in the later months.

Collected by Ernst and Young
I recently had a painting purchased by Ernst & Young. Sunflower was featured in The Washington Post Sunday Source section when the show at DCAC was opening. For me it's the first sale of my work to a major corporation.

Art-O-Matic
AOM was so good to me last time that I just cant resist doing it agin this year. One of the things I really like about AOM is the ability to show a group of artworks as opposed to one of those shows with 50 works by 50 artists and no one remembers anything.

Labels: , , , ,

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

William Christenberry at the Katzen part 1.5 (really just thinking out loud)

Thanks for sticking with me today while I continue talking about William Christenberry's current show at the Katzen Art Center at American University. I have been thinking about a discussion that arises with the idea of the grid and how it relates to WC's art in an era that could be defined as reductive - by this I mean the early seventies and into the very early eighties, the early stages of his mature artistic output.

I have always thought of the work as documentary in style and presentation - while I still find this to be true, I'm starting to think about the serial nature of the places that are photographed in Christenberry's work. Why for instance have I seen more that 10 different versions of The Palmist Building, The Green Warehouse, Sprott Church, and The Bar-B-Q Inn. Certainly these images could create a grid of changes to the location or even a timeline of the same, however could we now start to see that structure as a formal 3 dimensional grid that could represent; image of the location, deterioration of the location, year of the location, anthropological uses of the location. An x,y, and z axis if you will. This grid (or cube) could now start to also work in other disciplines - his drawings, paintings, and sculptures of the locations (or details thereof) of said subject combined.

There is a secondary question to this that needs to be asked as well - Is this an intention of the artist or is this something that has sprung from reading the output of his practice. Or is it a combination of both, in my mind, probably both. While this says nothing definitive of WC's work, it does raise a curious thought about art we (especially in the DC area) have grown very accustomed to.

Clearly this post is as much me thinking aloud as it is definitive theory - I have been kind of rolling the idea around for the last couple of days just to see where it might stick.

Labels: , , , , ,

Wednesday, February 13, 2008

Quick mention by JT Kirkland at Thinking About Art

Thank you JT Kirkland for the kind words on your blog, Thinking About Art.

Follow this link for the article.

By the way, Sunday is the last day. So get down there - I'll be around a little bit this weekend so say hello.

Labels: , , ,

Friday, February 01, 2008

A quick review in the City Paper today



Thanks go out to Kriston Capps for his review of my show in the Washington City Paper today. You can even read it online here.

Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, January 22, 2008

A review and a mention for my current show



A big thank you to Kelly Rand of DCist who reviewed my show for the DCist web site. Follow this link for the story.

Also I had a brief mention on the Washington Post Web site by the "Going Out Gurus" in the Got Plans? section of the website. I guess this is a transcript of a conversation held on Thursday, Jan 17, 2008. I'm mentioned in a question about 1/3 of the way down. Follow this link.

Labels: , , ,

Friday, January 18, 2008

Where is Sluggo going?



I have it on good authority that he is going to DCAC tonight for my opening.

Hope to see you there.

Labels: , , ,

Monday, January 14, 2008

I found myself in the Washington Post this weekend.



You could have knocked me down with this one. The other day I received a call from the mysterious "B" Stanley at DCAC. He and I were talking about a couple of logistical things related to my show. He casually mentioned that "the Post" requested photos and didn't say much more. I of course was hoping for something to come from that - but was not expecting anything. So the color image of one of my paintings and a "Cant Miss" tag with it - pretty much has made my week. It has possibly added to my anxiety level a little bit as well - don't get me wrong, I'm not complaining.

Thanks to everyone who has been so supportive - I'll name names at the end of the week.

(click on the image to see a larger, more readable size)

Labels: , , ,

Thursday, December 20, 2007

A quick one

Lloyd Wolf shot my work for the DCAC show (January 18) on monday and here is a peek at one of the new images.

I have a great piece of news abut Lloyd as well - see you tomorrow.



No One Receiving, 2007, oil on canvas, 60" x 50"

Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, December 11, 2007

Fernando Botero - Abu Ghraib



This is the first U.S. exhibition of Botero's recent paintings documenting his reaction to news accounts and images made at U.S. military prison in Abu Ghraib, Iraq. There are two ways to go with this and I'll try to break this into two pieces, one about the paintings, the other about the politics. To me this exhibition forces me to re-examine the overall approach of Botero's art output in general. Botero, if you are not familiar with his work, has historically painted images of rotund, complacent and usually very wealthy people. Let's hold on to that thought for just a moment.

The Paintings
Showing the whole suite of artworks developed over a period of barely over a year Botero has moved quickly and decisively to develop an approach that fits stylistically into his oeuvre. These paintings are much thinner and painted in a much faster manner - they are in a way "samizdat" but paintings as opposed to printing(s). The approach of these images work for this suite of artworks - for this review, I'm going to suspend the "Painting is about "how" not "what" approach that I firmly believe in, because, the how of these images is secondary to the overall theme and message of the artworks. That said, the painting approach is perfunctory at best, but highly descriptive. In other words, the painting is just enough to tell the story. You will never be in love with the paint handling of these images, nor should you.

The Politics
The politics of torture are to most, not complex. Ask almost anyone and they will tell you that torture is morally wrong and they are opposed to it. I really believe that this is true only in abstraction. When torture enters our reality, the simplicity becomes complex. War is the great differentiator that changes the use of torture. I'm sure that there are a number of people that have no problem with the actions of the U.S. military in this situation. I do. I am appalled that this kind of image; forced humiliation and feminization, body piling and forced sexual experience, sodomization, urination as well as attack dogs are the legacy of our country's current real-politic on the world stage. This - to borrow from Tom Wolf - is the "wrong stuff".

There is another kind of politic at work here as well; the personal politics of a single voice. I've read before that to many, art is the expression of an individual that may or may not be in step with the personal desires of the population. I never really thought that I needed to see these paintings before I knew of their existence - however after learning about them over a year ago, I have been most interested in seeing them. Botero's personal feelings come through loud and clear. That reflection of the personal politic is one of the few ways art can become a powerful moving force in our political culture.

I'm curious about the implications that these acts of torture by a "civilized country" such as ours will bring to us as a nation in the future.

The Approach of Botero's Artworks
I asked you to hold on to the knowledge that Botero has historically painted images of rotund, complacent and usually very wealthy people. I am now forced to re-evaluate those images as not the light hyper-real satire that they seem to be, but possibly a much darker version of ourselves where our worst actions manifest themselves physically and place our true core of humanity on display for everyone to understand.

Fernando Botero - Abu Ghraib, is on display at the Katzen Art Center at American University through December.

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, December 04, 2007

Diebenkorn at The San Jose Museum



It is not everyday that Richard Diebenkorn has a museum focus on him, and that is a shame. The last museum show that I could find on RD is from the Phillips (DC) in the early 1990's. That said I was happy to hear about the recent show DIEBENKORN IN NEW MEXICO: 1950-1952, at the San Jose Museum.

RD is best known and associated with San Francisco, from his involvement with the bay area figurative painters and later with his amazing "Ocean Park" series. I have never associated RD with "Albuquerque" of all places. Granted he does have a presence in the DC area which is widely known and spoken of as he claimed to use the museums as a training ground in the beginning of his art career when he was stationed here in the military.

This show will not doubt raise some questions concerning RD's early work - particularly his abstractions. One of the things I'm most interested in will be to see how the desert and its forms carry into his body of work. A body of work so connected to the west coast.

I will not be visiting the Show - I'd love to hear anyones reactions and thoughts.

Richard Diebenkorn, Untitled (Albuquerque), 1952. Oil on canvas, 68 x 60 inches (174.6 x 152.4 cm). The Buck Collection, Laguna Beach, California. Copyright The Estate of Richard Diebenkorn.

Labels:

Friday, November 30, 2007

Show scheduled for January 18th

I'll be having a one-person show at District of Columbia Arts Center (DCAC) of new paintings and paperworks. JW Mahoney has been kind enough to take the curatorial reigns on the show. Lloyd Wolf is doing some photography for me in the next week or so and as soon as they are ready I'll post a preview or two.

Interestingly enough, I was asked to propose the show after Art-o-matic, with everything people say one way or the other about AOM it has been a tremendous success for me and has opened doors I would not have thought possible.

The show opens January 18th - I hope to see you then,

Labels: , ,

Thursday, November 29, 2007

Harvard gets Barnett Newman archive



The Center for the Technical Study of Modern Art, a research arm of Harvard University Art Museums, has been given Barnett Newman's studio materials. The gift includes discarded paint trials, notes, sketches, and models of Broken Obelisk and gives researchers technical information about the artists studio practice.

Barnett Newman, Jackson Pollock, and Tony Smith at the Betty Parsons Gallery By Hans Namuth (1915-1990) Gelatin silver print, April 1951. National Portrait Gallery, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.; gift of the estate of Hans Namuth

Labels: , ,

Monday, October 22, 2007

Morris Louis at the Hirshhorn



Morris Louis produced a startling amount of work in the short span of time that was his life. Between 1954 - 1962 Louis produced more than 600 artworks in what was for it's time a stunning new direction. This direction has become known as "Color-Field Painting".

The theory is that Color-Field Painting is based on two general components; color and field. There are a few lesser ideas as well, one of which is working away from any kind of figure-ground relationship, and it is heavily weighted on the shoulders of Clement Greenberg. Greenberg's raise was the championing of the Abstract Expressionists and Color-Field Painting was his second act.

In the past few years, Greenberg has fallen from critical favor and the group of artists that are pulled down with him are the Color-Field artists. It has become clear to me that Color-Field Painting needs to be looked at through a different lens if it is going to regain any footing in the history of art as a whole (I'm talking group of artists not individuals). The fact is, that Helen Frankenthaler and Morris Louis have created some amazing paintings (as have Olitski, Gilliam, Noland, and Davis to name a few) however what struck me about Louis's painting in this show was the incredible amount of process that is right at the surface of these artworks, combine the obvious links between Color-Field Painting and what would become known as minimalism and you have a serious mix of artworks to be looked at through a very different lens than that of "Greenbergian" doctrine. I think this is the reason these paintings stay at the forefront of art, while the "movement" as a whole is kind of a sinking ship. At the end of the day, color-field or other reductive strategies are still being used to make artworks. Hence the serious need to develop a new way of looking and thinking about these artists.

Which brings me back to the Morris Louis show, Two works in particular stood out to me, Dalet Tet, 1959, an amazing amount of work in creating this canvas - with so many pours developing into a rich velvet like black with color pours dancing underneath. This was the first piece that I saw of Louis's that made me think and visually explore more about the process of his artwork. The second piece Beth Chet, 1958, with it's array of browns and umbers, this image stands out for me as much for it's difference to the other works, as well as it's use of semi-architectural elements. (sorry, no images were available)

This is the first museum show of Louis's work in 20 years. The show, although a little on the short side is still a very strong show if for no other reason than it is time to start critically reassessing a pivotal time in abstract image making. Highly Recommended.

Morris Louis Now
An American Master Revisited at the Hirshhorn Sept 20 - January 6

Image at top: Morris Louis, Number 99, 1959-1960
Acrylic resin (Magna) on canvas, The Cleveland Museum of Art, Contemporary Collection of the Cleveland Museum of Art, 1968.110. Copyright 1960 Morris Louis.

Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, October 16, 2007

Fontana Mix for October 16, 2007



Matthew Collings
Regular readers know of my enjoyment of Matthew Collings dairy in Modern Painters. Here's a pretty good interview with him on Artnet (amazing how they interview their own writers as an article - but that's another story) Here's a quick snippet.

writer: You made your reputation with TV programs and books on modern and contemporary art, but more recently you've turned your attention to Matt's Old Masters, and now you've remade Sir Kenneth Clark's Civilization. It would seem that you really do hate contemporary art these days.

Matthew Collings: I know a lot about art and want to talk about it. But knowing about it isn't the same as feeling you have to mindlessly support it and say the accepted things about it to show you're in a creepy club, or that you can intimidate people who don't know about it. That's the theme of all my books and programs. The new series is about how we might understand "civilization" today (that is, if we think we've still got it). It goes from the Greeks to now, but it's all from the perspective of now. The book that comes out of the series is more diaristic and confessional; it's about my tragic parents and so on, what I thought yesterday, etc., as in Blimey. There's also some stuff about Clark and the whole idea of TV arts programs. But the true focus of both the book and the TV series is the anxieties and uncertainties of art now, taking "art" as a kind of culture or constant, ongoing discussion, not just a collection of individual objects or shows.

Glenn Branca
A couple of days I alerted readers about a GB performance of Symphony No.13: Hallucination City for 100 electric guitars. Well it seems that PGWP saw this performed in LA about a year os so ago.

Follow this link to the story

Johnnie Winona Ross
One of my favorite artists, JWR (above: Sand Bend Draw, 2005) has a new show in New York this week at Steven Haller Gallery. I'll review this later in the month. But don't wait for me, exhibition is from October 18 - November 24.

Lori Nix
Randall Scott Gallery is showing Lori Nix (another favorite / below: The Majestic, 2006) along with Dane Picard right here in Washington DC. Exhibition is from October 27 - December 8. I'm missing this opening, however do expect a review.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Thursday, October 11, 2007

A quick story about the studio

I went to the library and among other things, I checked out a book on Jasper Johns (focused on the late seventies and eighties) so I'm flicking through the book and see a series of pages that are smeared with oil paint. It wasn't my oil paint which was just great. I love the idea that multiple artists are looking at the same paintings - or even books and getting the same or different things. I love that.

I want to start talking about process more often and realize I still agree with the teaching from Dogen's Shobogenzo Zuimonki. For those of you coming to the party a little bit late, here's the Cliffs Notes version:

Students are taught not to worry about clothing or food and only to focus on "the way". After a few rounds of questions regarding the practicality of such an approach, Dogen responded that the important thing is to be focused on "the way", these other things are trivial in the whole of your practice.

Starting next week, I'll be talking a bit about my process - I'd love to hear about yours as well.

Labels: ,

Thursday, October 04, 2007

Artist studios

I love reading (and visiting) other people's studios - and this is no exception. Robert Ayers has a short interview with Brice Marden about what, is in his studio on Artinfo.

Follow this link

Labels: ,

Monday, October 01, 2007

This business of digital work being the real thing.

Elisabetta Povoledo writes for The New York Times on saturday, about the digitization of Veronese's The Wedding at Cana being installed on the island of San Giorgio Maggiore a few weeks ago. The article goes into great depth about the painstaking work of how this masterpiece was scanned, scrutinized, and eventually printed, and touched up to become very close to the real thing or at least a photo of the real thing - or something that resembles the original as it now exists.

The group Factum Arte has digitally recreated, in what I understand is in amazing detail and has hung it in the same place it was removed from almost 210 years ago.

Here's a bit of the backstory
Napoleon's forces removed the painting from the refectory of the Church of San Giorgio Maggiore as war booty - cutting the painting into pieces and reassembling it back home. It currently hangs at the Louvre (Paris) directly across from the Mona Lisa and is claimed to be viewed by 9 million visitors a year by the French authorities. (sidebar: do you remember any of the other paintings in that room? - I don't)

Venice has always wanted this painting back - they still occasionally have mock trials of Napoleon and every few years someone wants to sue the Louvre or the French Government for it's return. That return is not going to happen since it was resolved (diplomatically) in 1815.

Back to the story
So what we have is a very serious digital reproduction sitting in place of what is now somewhere else. Do understand that I believe that this digital copy - which took 18 months to do - is probably one hell of an object. However it is not an art object. It carries no authenticity as art. The thing is, I believe in art, the real thing - not copies, duplicates or substitutions. I want to experience, the presence of something, it may be ancient or temporary - but I want to experience that thing. I want to see the same paint, rock or whatever the artist did when he or she made it. This is as close to religion as I have, and I care for it deeply. This "new" The Wedding at Cana bothers me, I feel like it's starting a bit of a trend where this will become an acceptable way to view art in the future. This is the crux of why I'm even bothering to write about this.

A couple of years ago I wrote about a Caravaggio exhibit that exhibited all of his paintings in one place as digital reproductions. People would say "It's just as good" or some such thing - but the truth is the show had the stink of not being real - and the public agreed - the show quietly went away.

I will give credit to Factum Arte who has insisted that the digital work is "not a clone but a deep and detailed study". I just hope that the public understands this when they see a artwork that looks like the real thing in the place where it was always meant to be, and is now for lack of a better word, home.





A Footnote Richard Hell, speaking about his first band, Television, stated; "All we did was cut our hair and played in street clothes, and people, so hungry for the real thing, worshipped us like gods".

Labels: , , ,

Thursday, September 13, 2007

WC Richardson at Geoform



I stumbled over this web site the other day, I'm sure most of you already knew about it - Geoform.

Anyhow to make a long story short, I found this very in-depth interview with Chip Richardson. Many of you know that I regard Chip as one of the best painters on the east coast. The interview focuses on the history of his work and some the directions it's taking now.

Well worth the read.

Above: Unfolded Sphere, oil & alkyd on canvas, 91 x 91 cm (36 x 36 in), 2006

Labels: , ,

Thursday, August 30, 2007

Botero donates Abu Ghraib paintings and drawings to UC Berkeley



Fernando Botero has donated twenty-five paintings and twenty-two drawings inspired by the abuse of Iraqis imprisoned at Abu Ghraib to UC Berkeley, according to Agence France-Presse. The paintings will be housed at the university's art museum, said Kathleen Maclay, a Berkeley spokeswoman. Botero has stressed that this series is not for sale and will have a home in the United States or Baghdad.

Labels: ,

Monday, June 04, 2007

No one is talking about ... Neo Rauch at the Met

I'm a little bit surprised by this because NR has been so hot for the last few years - along with "serious" critical writings by the art press. So when a new show happens at a major institution, of all new work, you would think someone would care.

Or am I way off on this one?

Labels: , ,

Monday, March 19, 2007

A Few Questions: Johnnie Winona Ross



Lets talk a bit about your process, I know your work has multiple layers and each layer seems to get sanded in some way - what brought you to such a complex approach to building your images?

Some of this question is attended in responses below Repeating the mark, or the drip, scraping, burnishing, builds a physical history within the painting I've used this example in the past, but it is still the best way that i know to explain; when you see worn stone steps, whether at an Anasazi site, or the Met, it is interesting to consider the scores of people that have used or using the steps in roughly the same way or seeing the keys on an old piano, worn with use. You realize that you are just part of the stream of history, a large or small part, but you are only moving through It is a humbling, and revealing realization I try to create the same in a painting The painting looks worn, (because it is) I repaint the painting sometimes 150 times, each time removing what I can, the linen is stretched at about the same tightness as the palm of one's hand, I'm pushing on that, it pushes back, I burnish, paint, drip, remove, burnish until it all comes together in an unexplainable way I try to locate the viewer in a history, or at least make them aware of the stream.

On top of the surface work - you clearly are concerned with showing how your work is attached to the support structure How or why did this develop as a key element to your work?

Maybe this has a little to do with the history above Every aspect of the experience of painting and viewing is as important as any part The stretcher plays a role that is as important as the painting of a zinc white stroke, fixing the linen with handmade copper tacks instead of shooting stables through the linen into the wood, is a philosophical choice Using Basswood instead of pine, every edge is slightly rounded so it feels good in the hands when you pick up a painting Using expansion corners so the stretch of the linen retains the feel of the palm of the hand regardless of being in the desert or with the humidity of the coast. There is a beauty in that, a craft, a care, conscience decisions being made that maybe helps one to be aware of the possibility of the sublime (I can't believe i'm using that word), the over all effect that the painting somehow transcends the everyday physical world.



I know that you often get compared to Agnes Martin, however I think comparisons like that are a bit of a cop out (even though I used it as well), I see a lot of different things in the approach of what is painted on - and the residue of its sanding off Who were some of the artists that influenced you in the earlier formation of your work?

Dame Agnes It is odd, and I am a little perplex by the comparisons I respond to her paper pieces, the delicate water colours, the grids, how she uses paper. I've had a more difficult time with her paintings, I really haven't looked close at that body of work, sure I see them, but they just don't hold enough interest for me, strange as it seems, there just isn't enough there for me I'm more interested in the Dame Agnes phenomena, how Agnes Martin became Dame Agnes, living in our small town That is interesting.

Serious influences, Brice was a major one for a number of reasons So much has been written about him over the years, but from the viewpoint of an artist who's education and development is placed specifically in a time period in which AbstractExpression was feeling somewhat over-used, and minimalism was beginning to overlap. Having professors that were AE, and some that were first gen out of Germany (Bauhaus). I was working in a minimalist direction, but as a painter. I was concerned with the painting as an object Ellsworth Kelly, the black and early metallic paintings of Frank Stella were really quite important and ground breaking I wanted the painting to both be an read as an object, and I also wanted the paint to utilize the AbEx language, ie the paint stroke to express something that was non-verbal and to add another complexity, Maleovich, Kindensky, and Zen artist, (Japan, Korea), begin to add a spiritualism that I couldn't separate, from the object and non-verbal expression It sounds a bit silly now, but in the late 60s as an artist trying to find his way, it was a monumental task, there were no footprints to follow. Brice Marden really made the leap with the monochrome panels. The physicality, the object, but with expression; marks in the encaustic, and importantly, the drips as the bottom. This was before Post-Modernism opened everything up.

Then he did it again, with the Cold Mountain series exhibited at Dia in the 80's. Brice added line to plane, with spiritualism as an underpinning.

FootPrints.

but...

Inspiration: Nature, the desert/mountain environment. Barrier Canyon Style rock art, amazing painting, so complex but direct. The Great Gallery in HorseShoe Canyon is one of my all time favorite pieces of art, the most powerful visual statement that I've ever seen It has been dated at 5000BC- 200BC. It is in Utah. Several Anasazi panels in our FourCorners area, including a beautiful panel just down the road from my casa, in the RioGrande Gorge. The burnishing of the pottery found around these sites. The burnishing was done to harden the surface before glazing was used. The surface is incredible, it is the inspiration for my burnished surface.

The images below are from an excursion to a site in Utah that i keep returning to, these were taken a few days ago. They are mixed cultures of Freemont, BarrierCanyon, Anasazi, (and some early century cowboy vandalism).







With the long timeline of your painting process, do you find yourself wanting to follow new directions, but maybe realizing that the new direction will not be able to be followed - possibly for months Does something like that influence your decision making and how do work with that if it does?

For instance, I'm working currently on a series of grid paintings, no drips. The dominate axis is vertical instead of horizontal. The vertical lines dominate, the horizontals seem like they are in an atmosphere well behind the verticals It feels like a Vermeer interior atmosphere. I began working on those about 3 years ago, along with the drip pieces, knowing that they will dominate what I do in the future, but I wasn't finished with the drip pieces, and had no desire to stop painting those. Again, the transition that occurs in my work is an evolution, 'the stream'. I also work with Tamarind Prints (litho), and SantaFe Editions (digital) to work out concepts on paper before moving to linen.

I recently read in the Brice Marden catalog for his recent show at MoMa that location can play a huge difference on the color and saturation of his paintings Working in the south-westen US Does location influence your work?

In terms of location; it is huge. Nature informs my work. I spent so many years working in a place that I didn't respond to, thinking it didn't really matter much. I lived in Maine, I was in nyc alot, I found I was traveling to the SouthWest every chance that I got. The light, the culture, the archeology, the desert, mountains. It was austere, real, exposed, but mysterious, it was not a casual place that you just were. It was a spiritual experience experiencing a rock art panel that was 2000-5000 years old, that is more affecting then any piece of art that i've ever seen. In 1994 I spent another year on grant at Roswell, my work really solidified, it wasn't like it really changed, it just became more powerful, it began to have that feeling of 'experiencing the rock art panel', or 'experiencing the desert', it became still, real, and a unique experience My studio has 12' glass doors that face a 13,000' mountain, to one side of that is Taos Mt the sacred mt. It is an unobstructed view. That view feeds me, everytime that I look up.

When I moved from Maine in '99 the underpinnings of my current work had been in place for about 10 years. I built a studio, and added a second room to my small adobe. This took almost a year, 2 native americans worked with me. When I moved into the studio, the first work that I did, (for Site SantaFe), was surprising in it's austerity, focus, and power It was work that I could not have done in Maine. The brightness of the light seem to manifest itself in the predominance of the whites, which also focused and grounded the work. Colour became quite subtle. (much like the environment I was working in). The drips seem to take on an additional meaning in the desert where water is precious. Most of my marks created an additional effect naturally, as in the transitions of opacity of the whites, which is a result of process, all of which is more efficient, which is how one lives in the desert. These are paintings that are located specifically, but responded to by a pretty large audience.

What artists are you currently looking at?

Those unknown artists 5000 years ago that painted and burnished the rocks around me.

I thought the Robert Mangold show 'Pillars' was interesting. Brice Marden, Wes Mills, Stuart Arends, Ellsworth Kelly, Vermeer, early Robert Ryman, James Turrell, Donald Judd in Marfa, Texas I'm not seeing much work by younger artists that really affects my spirit, I see some cleaver, interesting work, but at the end of the day, it usually does not change me someway.

What's next (upcoming shows, etc)?

A book is being published, released in october Large format, approx 300 pages, designed by Skolkin + Chickey, foreword written by Douglas Dreishpoon, (Knox-Albright), and the main text written by Carter Ratcliff There are limited editions including one with a small painting, also one with a panel mounted print. I have a show with Stephen Haller, nyc; in October There are several things happening in 08 and 09, which is as far as I want to see my life organized!

Labels: ,

Tuesday, March 13, 2007

Some interesting things in New York this early spring/late winter



Robert Ryman and Robert Mangold both showing at Pace this month. Ryman is showing uptown - which I think is a curious choice, as I really think of him as a "downtown" artist - yes, I realize this hardly matters anymore but I have moments of being old so please deal with that. Also Susan Rothenberg is showing uptown as well. In addition to that, MoMA has Jennifer Bartlett's "Rhapsody" on display as well as further uptown is High Times, Hard Times: New York Painting 1967-1975 the new york post minimal painting show. I guess a trip is about to happen.



Also Olivier Mosset and "Indian Larry" are showing something at Spencer Brownstone - I have no idea what, because "Indian Larry" was a "old skool" chopper builder who was known for riding his motorcycle standing on the seat. "Indian Larry" Died a couple of years ago - I don't know how much he contributed to this installation. BTW, the indian part is because he rode Indian motorcycles not because of a crappy nickname.

Labels: ,

Thursday, February 22, 2007

Following up on williamsburg handmade paints



Ok, I broke down and bought a few tubes of "the good stuff" as they say and here is what I'm thinking. Yes, this is great paint. It is highly recommended as well. and no, I wont be buying much more of it.

Here's why. I'm too cheap. (partially)

The real reason is that even though it brushes and flows amazingly, I use "a lot" of paint - with a lot of mediums on my paintings and it just isn't cost effective. It really is a fine product and worth the cost if you are painting with a more traditional approach (ie. thinner mediums like turpentine and stand oil).

For more information, follow this link

Labels:

Monday, January 29, 2007

A few NGA notes...

It is nice to see the Phillip Guston's hanging in a spot that deserves a second look - These paintings just keep getting better and better and feel more relevant than ever.

I think we can take Ad Rhienhart's "the stations of the cross" series down for awhile - I think these have been up since the East wing opened - at least it feels like it. Let me be clear - these are not his best work.

The NGA has two really great Rymans. I still love the Rachel Whiteread sculpture upstairs as well.

Labels: , ,

Monday, January 08, 2007

Jasper Johns this January at the National Gallery of Art



Jasper Johns is probably the greatest painter in the second half of the twentieth century. That is quite a statement, I know. However when you look at the body of work into the 1970's you will see many of the critical approaches stemming from work he pursued. I'm talking specifically about; Pop, Minimal, Conceptual, and Pattern and Decoration. Artists from each of these movements all owe at least a strong nod to his work, especially when you look at the way he used systems and approaches to breakdown and re construct painting.

Jasper Johns: An Allegory of Painting, 1955-1965 goes on view January 28th.

By the way, Target is the sponsor of this show. I'm sure that is no accident. Lets hope that the corporate meat grinder is unable to completely co-opt artwork that has far greater meaning (or lack of meaning, if you know what I mean) as opposed to simply becoming a shill for the newest version of Kmart. (Please don't tell me how they love design, because we all know that as soon as that sales ploy ends, the whole "we love design thing" is gone)

Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, January 02, 2007

Hey painters...

Do any of you use Williamsburg Handmade Oil Paint? I'm curious because they seem really good - but I'm a little scared of the price tag - so drop a note if you are, I'd love to hear your thoughts.

Labels: ,

Monday, December 04, 2006

Sean Scully and Brice Marden retrospectives in New York through January 17

I'm quite surprised that I have not seen anyone comparing and contrasting these two shows - they seem to go together intellectually quite well. After Art Basel I'll be in New York and will do just this thing - look for it in about 2 weeks - maybe 3.

Labels: , , , ,

Tuesday, October 31, 2006

Brice Marden and Chris Ofili in last months Artforum



So you might have guessed that I was on vacation last couple of weeks and caught up on my reading. As an artist the best thing I read that two weeks was the interview of these two painters talking about painting. No art history or polemics - just the standard studio type questions friend might talk about. Did you know that Marden really likes and paints to Jay-Z? I never would have guessed. The interview is just low key and really just two guys talking about painting - not about the idea of painting, but about light, oily spots to fix, music and studios.

It's a great read.

Labels: , , ,

Thursday, October 12, 2006

Some "uptown" shows this month



Botero - Abu Ghraib
Leave it to a man who paints chubby people to turn my head about the US atrocities at Abu Ghraib.

Here's my deal, I don't usually care for political art. Most of the time it's simply "something is bad, we should protest" type messaging. To me this defeats the basic notion that there are multiple concepts that make the struggle and trivializes the art with this childish simplicity. Fernand Botero is now showing paintings showing under the title Abu Ghraib. I'm glad he is. For if for no other reason - no one else will. Botero has approached a serious subject with his usual style and in doing so forces the viewer to see the ideas and concepts of torture differently. Will we get to see a fat woman with her finger pointed like a gun? or will we start to finally see the brutality of just what man is capable of doing to his fellow man?

I can see the jumping off point for FB and it opens doors to a deeper subversive quality to his work that never thought was there.


Neil Jenney & Donald Sultan
I never thought of Jenney or Sultan as "uptown" artists in fact both of them being more or less interested in reductive approaches to their work it seems like a curious fit. I know you might disagree with me on that, however even Jenney's "Bad Paintings" were extremely reductive in approach as well as final presentation. Both of these artists are not afraid to simplify - and both do so in a way that only reflects the amazing editing that goes on in the studio. This is a great pairing of artists who reward the viewer the longer the viewer cares to spend with the work.

This seems to me to be a great "artists for artists" type show, for it shows just how well smart decisions in the studio benefit the viewer on the other side of the object later on. That said - don't dismiss this show for lack of interest in process - it just might point to the fact that "how" is often more important than "what" gets created.

Labels:

Wednesday, April 26, 2006

Jennifer Bartlett's "Rhapsody" to be installed in MoMA Atrium



I'm a big fan of the so called "new image painters" so I'm very interested to see how this will look at MoMA. I'm pretty sure it will not be everyone's favorite - especially since this period is not very fashionable right now. I think its going to be real nice to see a piece of art that deserves a bit of notice. I like Peter Doig too, but I don't see myself missing his work at the moment.

"Rhapsody" is composed of 987 painted steel panels, each 12 x 12 inches, It is focused many stylistic tendencies of the 1970s, from minimalism to pattern and decoration to conceptualism, in a single work. It is a large and over-reaching piece that I believe is successful in many ways - in my opinion, its well worth a few minutes of your time.

Labels: ,